95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
47.14%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
70.16%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SAND's 13.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
78.16%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SAND's 26.92%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
78.16%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SAND's 8.63%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
96.62%
Net income growth above 1.5x SAND's 47.17%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
84.21%
EPS growth above 1.5x SAND's 50.56%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
105.88%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SAND's 49.43%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.11%
Positive OCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-3124.58%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
81.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 34.25%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
36841732.28%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 75.49%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
59.87%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1234.52%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 99.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
14311.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26453.71%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 38.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1590.09%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
672.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 50.58%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.16%
AR growth well above SAND's 18.98%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-28.98%
Inventory is declining while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
117.23%
Asset growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.31%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
50.21%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.17%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.80%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.