PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.31%
Revenue growth of 1.31% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
428.44%
Gross profit growth of 428.44% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
1191.12%
Positive EBIT growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1191.12%
Positive operating income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
130.31%
Positive net income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
133.33%
Positive EPS growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
133.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.83%
OCF growth under 50% of SAND's 38.95%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-7.04%
Negative FCF growth while SAND is at 40.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
80.53%
10Y CAGR of 80.53% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
201.03%
5Y CAGR of 201.03% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-0.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1448.55%
Positive OCF/share growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
13.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.84%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 0.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-25.18%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SAND is 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2112.95%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
94.55%
Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.40%
AR growth well above SAND's 4.65%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.66%
Asset growth well under 50% of SAND's 8.58%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
27.41%
Positive BV/share change while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-58.40%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.83%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SAND's 80.14%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.