PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.79%
Revenue growth of 29.79% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
45.14%
Gross profit growth of 45.14% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
50.25%
Positive EBIT growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
50.25%
Positive operating income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
51.37%
Positive net income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
36.36%
Positive EPS growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
36.36%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
9.22%
Share change of 9.22% while SAND is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
9.14%
Slight or no buyback while SAND is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.41%
OCF growth at 75-90% of SAND's 71.98%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
140.85%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
235.19%
10Y CAGR of 235.19% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
179.18%
5Y CAGR of 179.18% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
33.83%
3Y CAGR of 33.83% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
399.61%
Positive OCF/share growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
53.51%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
290.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
37.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
251.55%
Below 50% of SAND's 878.32%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
73.36%
Below 50% of SAND's 878.32%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 267.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Negative asset growth while SAND invests at 76.05%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.17%
We have a declining book value while SAND shows 77.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-52.05%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SAND's 165.08%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.