PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.28%
Negative revenue growth while SAND stands at 107.44%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.67%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 109.70%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-6.08%
Negative EBIT growth while SAND is at 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.08%
Negative operating income growth while SAND is at 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
30.00%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SAND's 42.63%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
75.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x SAND's 42.68%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
75.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SAND's 42.68%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.40%
Share count expansion well above SAND's 0.42%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.45%
Diluted share count expanding well above SAND's 0.42%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.22%
OCF growth under 50% of SAND's 72.78%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
5.22%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
210.94%
10Y CAGR of 210.94% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
149.23%
5Y CAGR of 149.23% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
51.45%
3Y CAGR of 51.45% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
1261.50%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
330.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
67.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
426.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 83.78%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
133.14%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 83.78%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1497.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 318.66%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
453.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SAND's 318.66%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
68.14%
Below 50% of SAND's 318.66%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.44%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 29.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.67%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
6.55%
Positive BV/share change while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-5.88%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.14%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 23.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.