PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
61.12%
Revenue growth under 50% of SAND's 730.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
80.95%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SAND's 794.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
49.00%
Positive EBIT growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
49.00%
Positive operating income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
77.62%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 1733.03%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
157.14%
EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 1729.79%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
157.14%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 1729.79%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
2.51%
Share change of 2.51% while SAND is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
2.79%
Diluted share change of 2.79% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.90%
OCF growth under 50% of SAND's 1762.02%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
56.72%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
111913529.36%
10Y CAGR of 111913529.36% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
347.36%
5Y CAGR of 347.36% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
88.39%
3Y CAGR of 88.39% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
56378.70%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 5068.99%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
751.37%
Below 50% of SAND's 5068.99%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
129.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 5068.99%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1226663.69%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 2408.47% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
816.94%
Below 50% of SAND's 2408.47%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
212.66%
Below 50% of SAND's 2408.47%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
347.46%
Below 50% of SAND's 948.83%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
82.95%
Below 50% of SAND's 948.83%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.10%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 588.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.48%
Asset growth well under 50% of SAND's 76.00%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
11.57%
Under 50% of SAND's 75.22%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.25%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.55%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SAND's 88.05%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.