PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.91%
Negative revenue growth while SAND stands at 6088.39%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.35%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 6093.02%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-3.96%
Negative EBIT growth while SAND is at 556.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-3.96%
Negative operating income growth while SAND is at 556.70%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-8.80%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 182.11%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-9.52%
Negative EPS growth while SAND is at 183.73%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-9.52%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SAND is at 184.39%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 2.62%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 5.83%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
0.02%
Dividend growth of 0.02% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-0.62%
Negative OCF growth while SAND is at 826.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-82.43%
Negative FCF growth while SAND is at 140.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
56.04%
10Y CAGR of 56.04% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
176.47%
5Y CAGR of 176.47% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
229.79%
3Y CAGR of 229.79% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
12196.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 3969.32%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
268.99%
Below 50% of SAND's 3969.32%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
426.39%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 751.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
10696.01%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 331.21% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
273.92%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of SAND's 331.21%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
367.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 205.73%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
2022.77%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 498.07%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
155.80%
Below 50% of SAND's 498.07%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
97.53%
Below 50% of SAND's 566.47%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.73%
Our AR growth while SAND is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.66%
Negative asset growth while SAND invests at 7.37%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.38%
75-90% of SAND's 4.51%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-7.69%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
We expand SG&A while SAND cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.