PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.60%
Revenue growth under 50% of SAND's 15.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-0.21%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 23.58%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.18%
EBIT growth below 50% of SAND's 8.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.18%
Operating income growth under 50% of SAND's 8.56%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
7.19%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SAND's 11.16%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
7.89%
EPS growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
7.89%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 19.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.06%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 1.11%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.02%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
199.89%
Dividend growth of 199.89% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-2.13%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
453.95%
FCF growth above 1.5x SAND's 206.03%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
571.98%
10Y CAGR of 571.98% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
174.59%
5Y CAGR of 174.59% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
295.52%
3Y CAGR of 295.52% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
9273.18%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 16195.73%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
242.80%
Below 50% of SAND's 16195.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
489.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SAND's 390.03%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
13730.08%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 2315.81% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
280.54%
Below 50% of SAND's 2315.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
321.94%
Below 50% of SAND's 969.07%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
2138.64%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 777.82%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
158.46%
Below 50% of SAND's 777.82%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
128.51%
Below 50% of SAND's 710.13%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.87%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.04%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 3.51%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
4.81%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SAND's 2.66%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-8.33%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.24%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 120.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.