PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.93%
Negative revenue growth while SAND stands at 0.99%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.34%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-16.55%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-16.55%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-15.36%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-15.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-15.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 8.69%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.12%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 8.33%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-44.44%
Dividend reduction while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-25.60%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-394.81%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
474.43%
10Y CAGR of 474.43% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
155.90%
5Y CAGR of 155.90% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
104.72%
3Y CAGR of 104.72% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
318.78%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 4322.24%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
198.21%
Below 50% of SAND's 4322.24%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
151.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 308.71%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
2734.24%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 324.61% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
292.06%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of SAND's 324.61%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
215.81%
Below 50% of SAND's 5772.56%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
3071.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 1074.11%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
146.06%
Below 50% of SAND's 1074.11%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
59.98%
Below 50% of SAND's 204.35%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.09%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SAND's 367.13%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.34%
Negative asset growth while SAND invests at 86.71%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
4.54%
Under 50% of SAND's 73.88%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-11.10%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.05%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.