PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-28.37%
Negative revenue growth while SAND stands at 23.67%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-23.08%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 1.43%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.72%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-19.72%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-24.94%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-24.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-26.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-34.81%
Negative OCF growth while SAND is at 7.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-787.15%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
565.78%
10Y CAGR of 565.78% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
164.81%
5Y CAGR of 164.81% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
131.26%
3Y CAGR of 131.26% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
89499.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 592.02%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
215.34%
Below 50% of SAND's 592.02%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
177.71%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 542.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
7607.09%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
200.94%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
188.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3166.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 177.92%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
149.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SAND's 177.92%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
75.26%
Below 50% of SAND's 162.55%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.73%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.97%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 30.47%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
3.82%
Under 50% of SAND's 22.43%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
2077.39%
Debt growth of 2077.39% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.73%
SG&A growth well above SAND's 9.60%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.