PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.00%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-1.07%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1.07%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.07%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
8.72%
Positive net income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.98%
Share count expansion well above SAND's 0.53%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.94%
Slight or no buyback while SAND is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.62%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 16.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
113.34%
FCF growth similar to SAND's 115.64%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
252.80%
10Y CAGR of 252.80% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
46.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 3915.88%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-28.54%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
388.16%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 196.15%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
38.42%
Below 50% of SAND's 1090.95%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-44.68%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
230.32%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-14.41%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-66.75%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1009.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 1577.18%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
105.03%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SAND's 118.95%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
37.47%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to SAND's 36.60%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.64%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SAND invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
3.32%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SAND's 18.27%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.23%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-7.41%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-10.63%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.92%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.