PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.48%
Negative revenue growth while SAND stands at 35.70%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-16.49%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 848.90%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-22.71%
Negative EBIT growth while SAND is at 213.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-22.71%
Negative operating income growth while SAND is at 213.70%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
124.21%
Net income growth at 75-90% of SAND's 152.72%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
123.81%
EPS growth at 75-90% of SAND's 155.56%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
123.81%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of SAND's 155.56%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-14.72%
Negative OCF growth while SAND is at 94.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
114.79%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 102.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
233.81%
10Y CAGR of 233.81% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
3.82%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 70.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-19.84%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
275.60%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 555.32%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-21.68%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is at 180.26%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-39.59%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
36.10%
Below 50% of SAND's 435.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-70.63%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SAND is 542.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-72.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SAND is 172.35%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
379.39%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 109.72%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
52.05%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with SAND's 55.92%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
13.33%
Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.29%
AR growth well above SAND's 14.47%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.23%
Negative asset growth while SAND invests at 6.90%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.14%
Under 50% of SAND's 9.66%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.62%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SAND's 381.74%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.