PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.68%
Revenue growth under 50% of SAND's 11.66%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.02%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SAND's 54.82%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.37%
EBIT growth below 50% of SAND's 109.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
0.37%
Operating income growth under 50% of SAND's 109.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-1.53%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 350.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 19.90%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.02%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 25.73%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-29.69%
Dividend reduction while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
3.56%
OCF growth at 50-75% of SAND's 6.77%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
3.57%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
157.92%
10Y CAGR of 157.92% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
0.79%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-0.77%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
139.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 1931.76%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-19.65%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-13.05%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
74.58%
Below 50% of SAND's 190.52%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-55.47%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
1100.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 48.33%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
235.48%
Below 50% of SAND's 869.31%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
36.34%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
14.09%
Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.06%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
65.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 65.81% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
56.16%
AR growth well above SAND's 10.51%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.01%
Negative asset growth while SAND invests at 22.29%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.66%
Under 50% of SAND's 2.48%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-10.39%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.14%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 22.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.