Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Positive revenue growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Gross profit growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.

Positive EBIT growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Net income growth above 1.5x SAND's 76.88%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.

EPS growth above 1.5x SAND's 80.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.

Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SAND's 78.95%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.

Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 0.51%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.

Slight or no buyback while SAND is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.

10Y CAGR of 115.86% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.

Positive 5Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 333.80% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 101.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 103.13%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 71.00% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Our AR growth while SAND is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Positive asset growth while SAND is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We have some new debt while SAND reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We expand SG&A while SAND cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.