PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.48%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SAND's 4.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
34.24%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SAND's 5.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
61.16%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SAND's 20.12%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
61.16%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SAND's 20.12%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
739.91%
Positive net income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
766.67%
Positive EPS growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
766.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
8.97%
OCF growth under 50% of SAND's 25.91%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
9.36%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
264.31%
10Y CAGR of 264.31% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
9.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
8.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 3.14%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
210.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 399.36%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-17.22%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is at 9.31%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-5.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND stands at 4.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
130.83%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of SAND's 148.69%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
-42.21%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
26.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
180.93%
Below 50% of SAND's 1282.11%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
22.48%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
14.01%
Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.61%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 7.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of SAND's 5.31%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.04%
Positive BV/share change while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.01%
We’re deleveraging while SAND stands at 9167.65%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.36%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.