PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.81%
Negative revenue growth while SAND stands at 18.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-23.27%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-256.60%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-256.60%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-317.43%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-315.38%
Negative EPS growth while SAND is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-315.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SAND is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.31%
Slight or no buybacks while SAND is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.30%
Slight or no buyback while SAND is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.56%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-8.06%
Negative FCF growth while SAND is at 156.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
205.89%
10Y CAGR of 205.89% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
2.32%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 3.36%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-12.59%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SAND stands at 5.81%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
176.09%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-14.51%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-20.28%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND stands at 9.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-552.06%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-257.57%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-302.57%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
161.66%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 66.43%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
17.18%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
3.49%
Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.77%
Dividend/share CAGR of 13.77% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
69.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 69.37% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-27.48%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.67%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.48%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-7.41%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.45%
We cut SG&A while SAND invests at 4.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.