PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.17%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.25%
Positive gross profit growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3.15%
Positive EBIT growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3.15%
Positive operating income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2.06%
Positive net income growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Slight or no buybacks while SAND is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.23%
Slight or no buyback while SAND is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
3.61%
Dividend growth of 3.61% while SAND is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-7.33%
Negative OCF growth while SAND is at 9.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-7.91%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
88.45%
10Y CAGR of 88.45% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
31.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SAND's 28.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-14.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SAND stands at 25.62%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
42.03%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 567.33%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
16.03%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SAND's 17.99%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
-25.58%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND stands at 34.28%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
16.64%
Below 50% of SAND's 191.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
23.39%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 35.83%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
603.37%
Below 50% of SAND's 24214.47%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
136.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 26.90%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
21.55%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.29%
Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 64.38% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
47.34%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 47.34% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
17.16%
Our AR growth while SAND is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
Asset growth well under 50% of SAND's 2.36%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.16%
50-75% of SAND's 3.80%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-13.66%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.41%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SAND's 40.02%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.