PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.68%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.85%
Positive gross profit growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-6.90%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.90%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
11.50%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 169.01%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.29%
EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 166.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 168.73%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.19%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 8.72%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.26%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 10.36%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-14.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
99.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 2972.28%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.84%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
22.28%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
73.19%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 913.71%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
25.11%
Positive OCF/share growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
19.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
51.85%
Below 50% of SAND's 563.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
77.41%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 133.44%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
54.11%
Below 50% of SAND's 403.22%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
123.94%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SAND's 103.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
9.22%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.03%
Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.08%
Dividend/share CAGR of 117.08% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
56.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.86% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
94433.33%
AR growth well above SAND's 25.51%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
Asset growth well under 50% of SAND's 5.41%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.22%
50-75% of SAND's 6.25%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-10.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
We expand SG&A while SAND cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.