PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.94%
Positive revenue growth while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
3.70%
Positive gross profit growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-0.01%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.01%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
2.54%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 73.80%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.78%
EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 33.33%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
2.78%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SAND's 33.33%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.13%
Slight or no buybacks while SAND is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above SAND's 0.14%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.78%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
97.38%
Positive FCF growth while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
33.15%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 5503.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
50.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 19.13%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
53.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 32.36%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
0.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 657.54%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
56.40%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to SAND's 58.38%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
57.62%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 36.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-11.94%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SAND is at 153.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
167.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 17.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-48.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SAND is 1143.67%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
90.57%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 51.23%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
19.17%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
11.80%
Positive short-term equity growth while SAND is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
666.81%
Dividend/share CAGR of 666.81% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
173.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 173.48% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
57.86%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 57.86% while SAND is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
139.98%
AR growth well above SAND's 46.53%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-1.95%
Inventory is declining while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.89%
Asset growth at 50-75% of SAND's 1.58%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
1.93%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SAND's 1.02%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-4.69%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.08%
SG&A growth well above SAND's 6.72%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.