PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.14%
Negative revenue growth while SAND stands at 14.39%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.04%
Negative gross profit growth while SAND is at 45.89%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.06%
Negative EBIT growth while SAND is at 201.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.06%
Negative operating income growth while SAND is at 201.73%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 857.69%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-32.43%
Negative EPS growth while SAND is at 859.42%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-32.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SAND is at 853.62%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Slight or no buybacks while SAND is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 0.81%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SAND stands at 2.26%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-21.46%
Negative OCF growth while SAND is at 52.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-60.38%
Negative FCF growth while SAND is at 158.63%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-18.34%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
5.34%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SAND's 45.03%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-16.68%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-36.08%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND stands at 95.95%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
5.49%
Below 50% of SAND's 79.27%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-24.69%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SAND stands at 9.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-34.59%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SAND is at 42.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
60.03%
Below 50% of SAND's 275.96%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
16.20%
Below 50% of SAND's 105.74%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
65.46%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 25.84%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
35.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 50.94%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
28.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 49.49%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.98%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 6.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-37.75%
Inventory is declining while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.15%
Positive asset growth while SAND is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.34%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.83%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-10.20%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SAND's 19.48%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.