PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.27%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.18%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-4.08%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-4.08%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-2.61%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-5.26%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-5.26%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SAND's 0.05%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while SAND is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-11.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-9.47%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
40.93%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
28.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 41.02%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-9.56%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
50.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 9.73%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
81.81%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 0.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-6.37%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
62.13%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
180.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
0.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while SAND is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
62.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SAND's 25.94%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
32.72%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SAND's 51.06%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
20.48%
Below 50% of SAND's 49.61%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.46%
Firm’s AR is declining while SAND shows 15.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while SAND stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.54%
Positive asset growth while SAND is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.74%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SAND's 0.06%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-4.23%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.25%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.