PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.68%
Revenue growth of 1.68% vs. zero growth in Gold. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
0.02%
Gross profit growth of 0.02% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
0.37%
EBIT growth of 0.37% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
0.37%
Operating income growth of 0.37% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-1.53%
Negative net income growth while Gold median is -1.36%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share growth above Gold median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.02%
Diluted share growth above 2x Gold median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
-29.69%
Dividend cuts while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
3.56%
OCF growth below 50% of Gold median of 10.02%. Jim Chanos would question if the firm is generating genuine operational cash.
3.57%
FCF growth 50-75% of Gold median of 5.79%. Guy Spier would worry about suboptimal capital allocation or weaker margins.
157.92%
10Y CAGR of 157.92% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
0.79%
5Y CAGR of 0.79% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-0.77%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
139.61%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Gold median of 53.94% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
-19.65%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 16.18%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-13.05%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 5.85%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
74.58%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Gold median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
-55.47%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Gold median is 27.26%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
1100.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Gold median of 39.54%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
235.48%
Equity/share CAGR of 235.48% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
36.34%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while Gold median is negative. Peter Lynch sees an advantage over struggling peers in capital accumulation.
14.09%
Positive short-term equity/share CAGR while Gold is negative. Peter Lynch finds a relative advantage vs. sector-level slowdown.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.06%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
65.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 65.81% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
56.16%
AR growth of 56.16% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-100.00%
Decreasing inventory while Gold is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.01%
Assets shrink while Gold median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.66%
Positive BV/share change while Gold median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
-10.39%
Debt is shrinking while Gold median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.14%
SG&A decline while Gold grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.