PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.54%
Negative revenue growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-33.72%
Negative gross profit growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-35.05%
Negative EBIT growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-35.05%
Negative operating income growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-89.31%
Negative net income growth while Gold median is -9.56%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-88.89%
Negative EPS growth while Gold median is -3.45%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-88.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Gold median is -3.45%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.10%
Share growth above Gold median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.08%
Diluted share growth above 2x Gold median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
-47.61%
Dividend cuts while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-19.81%
Negative OCF growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
16.12%
Positive FCF growth while Gold median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
163.47%
10Y CAGR of 163.47% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-10.49%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
10.49%
3Y CAGR of 10.49% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
171.76%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Gold median of 50.94% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
-26.75%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 15.43%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-0.73%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is -0.73%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-6.14%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Gold median of 50.16%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-64.60%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Gold median is 16.50%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
132.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Gold median of 21.54%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
222.43%
Equity/share CAGR of 222.43% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
25.26%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while Gold median is negative. Peter Lynch sees an advantage over struggling peers in capital accumulation.
8.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 8.87% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.77%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
86.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 86.39% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-84.01%
AR shrinking while Gold median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
We expand assets while Gold is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
-1.00%
Negative BV/share change while Gold median is -0.86%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
44.33%
Debt growth of 44.33% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.81%
SG&A decline while Gold grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.