PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.83%
Revenue growth of 5.83% vs. zero growth in Gold. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
12.55%
Gross profit growth of 12.55% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-10.38%
Negative EBIT growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-10.38%
Negative operating income growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-79.93%
Negative net income growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-81.25%
Negative EPS growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-81.25%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.17%
Share change of 0.17% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.23%
Diluted share change of 0.23% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
1.54%
Dividend growth of 1.54% while Gold median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
0.04%
OCF growth of 0.04% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
126.84%
FCF growth of 126.84% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
222.40%
10Y CAGR of 222.40% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-5.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-11.09%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
210.51%
OCF/share CAGR of 210.51% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-29.99%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 0.79%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-26.27%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
108.33%
Net income/share CAGR of 108.33% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-94.15%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Gold median is 65.46%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
103.66%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Gold median of 18.49%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
254.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 254.23% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
23.55%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while Gold median is negative. Peter Lynch sees an advantage over struggling peers in capital accumulation.
12.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 12.98% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.85%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
77.66%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 77.66% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
118.02%
AR growth of 118.02% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Assets shrink while Gold median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-0.46%
Negative BV/share change while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-8.44%
Debt is shrinking while Gold median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
SG&A growth of 156.46% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.