PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.68%
Revenue growth of 1.68% vs. zero growth in Basic Materials. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
0.02%
Gross profit growth of 0.02% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
0.37%
EBIT growth 50-75% of Basic Materials median of 0.63%. Guy Spier would be cautious about subpar efficiency or limited pricing power.
0.37%
Operating income growth below 50% of Basic Materials median of 1.75%. Jim Chanos would suspect structural cost disadvantages.
-1.53%
Negative net income growth while Basic Materials median is 0.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share growth above Basic Materials median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.02%
Diluted share change of 0.02% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-29.69%
Dividend cuts while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
3.56%
OCF growth of 3.56% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
3.57%
FCF growth of 3.57% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
157.92%
10Y CAGR of 157.92% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
0.79%
5Y CAGR of 0.79% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
-0.77%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
139.61%
OCF/share CAGR of 139.61% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-19.65%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-13.05%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
74.58%
Net income/share CAGR near Basic Materials median. Charlie Munger might see typical industry-level profit expansion over 10 years.
-55.47%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Basic Materials median is 54.51%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
1100.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Basic Materials median of 31.24%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
235.48%
Equity/share CAGR of 235.48% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
36.34%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 36.34% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
14.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 14.09% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.06%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
65.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 65.81% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
56.16%
AR growth of 56.16% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-100.00%
Decreasing inventory while Basic Materials is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.01%
Assets shrink while Basic Materials median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.66%
50-75% of Basic Materials median. Guy Spier sees a suboptimal approach to building intrinsic value vs. competitors.
-10.39%
Debt is shrinking while Basic Materials median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.14%
SG&A decline while Basic Materials grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.