PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.54%
Negative revenue growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-33.72%
Negative gross profit growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-35.05%
Negative EBIT growth while Basic Materials median is -1.30%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-35.05%
Negative operating income growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-89.31%
Negative net income growth while Basic Materials median is -3.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-88.89%
Negative EPS growth while Basic Materials median is -0.47%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-88.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Basic Materials median is -0.68%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.10%
Share change of 0.10% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-47.61%
Dividend cuts while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-19.81%
Negative OCF growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
16.12%
FCF growth of 16.12% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
163.47%
10Y CAGR of 163.47% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-10.49%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
10.49%
3Y CAGR of 10.49% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
171.76%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Basic Materials median of 4.40% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
-26.75%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-0.73%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-6.14%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Basic Materials median of 70.83%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-64.60%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Basic Materials median is 44.18%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
132.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Basic Materials median of 34.34%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
222.43%
Equity/share CAGR of 222.43% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
25.26%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 25.26% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
8.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR near Basic Materials median. Charlie Munger notes it as typical short-term equity expansion in the sector.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.77%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
86.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 86.39% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-84.01%
AR shrinking while Basic Materials median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
Asset growth of 5.95% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-1.00%
Negative BV/share change while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
44.33%
Debt growth of 44.33% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.81%
SG&A decline while Basic Materials grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.