PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.59%
Negative revenue growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-16.62%
Negative gross profit growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-15.52%
Negative EBIT growth while Basic Materials median is 0.52%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-15.52%
Negative operating income growth while Basic Materials median is 0.75%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-18.77%
Negative net income growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-18.92%
Negative EPS growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-18.92%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.05%
Share growth above Basic Materials median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.11%
Diluted share change of 0.11% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-44.76%
Dividend cuts while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-6.99%
Negative OCF growth while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
31.55%
FCF growth of 31.55% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
13.95%
10Y CAGR of 13.95% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
12.85%
5Y CAGR of 12.85% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
42.63%
3Y CAGR of 42.63% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
-5.57%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Basic Materials median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
21.90%
OCF/share CAGR of 21.90% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
82.91%
3Y OCF/share growth of 82.91% while Basic Materials median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-21.60%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Basic Materials median of 57.24%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
59.10%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Basic Materials median of 22.89%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
290.73%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Basic Materials median of 26.34%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
86.13%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Basic Materials median of 0.29% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
18.37%
5Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Basic Materials median. John Neff calls for higher returns or more efficient buybacks to match peers.
14.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Basic Materials median. Mohnish Pabrai credits disciplined capital allocation for short-term outperformance.
323.53%
Dividend/share CAGR of 323.53% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
190.02%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 190.02% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
66.46%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.46% while Basic Materials is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-24.73%
AR shrinking while Basic Materials median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
280.32%
Inventory growth far above Basic Materials median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
1.09%
Asset growth 75-90% of Basic Materials median. John Neff pushes for more aggressive or targeted expansions if ROI is high.
0.97%
Near Basic Materials median. Charlie Munger considers it standard net worth compounding for the sector.
-7.67%
Debt is shrinking while Basic Materials median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.65%
SG&A decline while Basic Materials grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.