PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.06%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 0.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.06%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 27.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.28%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.28%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while AEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2793.62%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3306.53%
EBITDA margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1735.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2025.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4755.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5580.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6963.43%
Tax expense reduction while AEM shows 409.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3021.48%
Net income decline while AEM shows 489.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3539.33%
Net margin decline while AEM shows 487.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2983.33%
EPS decline while AEM shows 489.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2983.33%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 489.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.