95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.14%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 8.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.00%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 7.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.47%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 9.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.42%
Margin decline while AEM shows 0.84% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.90%
Other expenses growth less than half of AEM's 13.11%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-5.47%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 11.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.07%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 8.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.47%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 57.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.37%
EBITDA decline while AEM shows 111.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.48%
EBITDA margin decline while AEM shows 95.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.96%
Operating income decline while AEM shows 160.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.94%
Operating margin decline while AEM shows 140.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
505.88%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.74%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.68%
Tax expense reduction while AEM shows 137.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.09%
Net margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.05%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.48%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.31%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.54%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.