95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.36%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 29.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-14.12%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 2.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
9.63%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AEM's 63.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.43%
Margin expansion 50-75% of AEM's 26.78%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.13%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 20.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-22.06%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 20.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.25%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 7.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.06%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.51%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AEM's 60.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.25%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of AEM's 24.57%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
17.56%
Operating income growth below 50% of AEM's 113.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.64%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AEM's 65.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-52.43%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
16.48%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of AEM's 260.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.52%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AEM's 179.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
775.68%
Tax expense growth while AEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.89%
Net income growth below 50% of AEM's 468.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.71%
Net margin growth below 50% of AEM's 340.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.00%
EPS decline while AEM shows 450.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.00%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 450.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.37%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 22.49%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
20.16%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 24.69%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.