95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
47.14%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 19.76%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
22.77%
Cost growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
70.16%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 35.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.65%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x AEM's 13.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
221.86%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.97%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 8.00%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
22.67%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AEM's 2.78%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.83%
D&A growth above 1.5x AEM's 18.31%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
72.99%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.98%
EBITDA margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
78.16%
Operating income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.08%
Operating margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-38.78%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 276.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
77.42%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of AEM's 325.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.58%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AEM's 255.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-112.65%
Tax expense reduction while AEM shows 2590.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
96.62%
Net income growth below 50% of AEM's 218.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.63%
Net margin growth below 50% of AEM's 165.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
84.21%
EPS growth below 50% of AEM's 218.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
105.88%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of AEM's 209.09%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.