PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.85%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 1.71%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
14.01%
Cost increase while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
32.57%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 12.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.51%
Margin expansion below 50% of AEM's 10.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.47%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 14.39%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
41.31%
Similar operating expenses growth to AEM's 39.97%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
21.65%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AEM's 2.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.23%
Interest expense growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.54%
D&A growth while AEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
33.13%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.41%
EBITDA margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.93%
Operating income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.01%
Operating margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-39.75%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 96.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.88%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of AEM's 122.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.18%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AEM's 118.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
61.18%
Tax expense growth while AEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.71%
Net income growth below 50% of AEM's 469.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.25%
Net margin growth below 50% of AEM's 459.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.22%
EPS growth below 50% of AEM's 462.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of AEM's 462.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.39%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 5.80%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.49%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 2.96%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.