PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.49%
Positive growth while AEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.50%
Cost growth less than half of AEM's 5.68%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
1.48%
Positive growth while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 3.31%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
5.12%
Operating expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.24%
Total costs growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3925.00%
Interest expense change of 3925.00% while AEM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
28.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x AEM's 6.91%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
6.05%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.84%
EBITDA margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.13%
Operating income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10587.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1271.67%
Tax expense growth while AEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.66%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.08%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.18%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.21%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.24%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.66%
Diluted share reduction while AEM shows 0.33% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.