95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.55%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 6.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.93%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 10.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-29.83%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 1.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.76%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 5.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-55.20%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 7.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-32.61%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 9.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-18.00%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 20.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-19.95%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.25%
EBITDA margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-19.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.58%
Operating margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-119.18%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 777.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-30.84%
Pre-tax income decline while AEM shows 54.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.11%
Pre-tax margin decline while AEM shows 45.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.17%
Tax expense reduction while AEM shows 32.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.31%
Net income decline while AEM shows 68.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.72%
Net margin growth below 50% of AEM's 57.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.00%
EPS decline while AEM shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.11%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.01%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while AEM shows 0.09% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.