95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.28%
Positive growth while AEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
222.53%
Cost increase while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-82.43%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-82.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.30%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 21.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.42%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
147.69%
Total costs growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.48%
Similar D&A growth to AEM's 38.56%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-86.12%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2651.65%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 20.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-365.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-365.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-119.87%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-362.24%
Net income decline while AEM shows 55.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-361.52%
Net margin decline while AEM shows 93.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-300.00%
EPS decline while AEM shows 40.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-325.00%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 40.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.15%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 7.89%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
9.54%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 8.43%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.