PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.55%
Revenue growth below 50% of AEM's 45.19%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-38.61%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 40.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
42.29%
Similar gross profit growth to AEM's 49.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
28.71%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x AEM's 2.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.97%
G&A reduction while AEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.97%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 7.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-35.51%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 27.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.29%
D&A growth less than half of AEM's 44.26%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
30.26%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AEM's 89.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
29.13%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to AEM's 30.67%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
31.40%
Operating income growth below 50% of AEM's 120.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.86%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AEM's 51.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4021.42%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 291.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Pre-tax income decline while AEM shows 163.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while AEM shows 81.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2353.67%
Tax expense growth while AEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.33%
Net income growth below 50% of AEM's 349.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.94%
Net margin growth below 50% of AEM's 209.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-73.33%
EPS decline while AEM shows 357.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.23%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 350.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.16%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.13%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.51%
Diluted share reduction while AEM shows 0.52% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.