95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
61.12%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 10.17%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
22.81%
Cost increase while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
80.95%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 20.42%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.30%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x AEM's 9.30%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.55%
G&A change of 29.55% while AEM maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.45%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 40.93%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
547.98%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 34.30%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
88.65%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AEM's 9.73%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.04%
D&A growth 50-75% of AEM's 45.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
45.74%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 22.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-9.55%
EBITDA margin decline while AEM shows 45.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
49.00%
Operating income growth 50-75% of AEM's 67.12%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-7.53%
Operating margin decline while AEM shows 51.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
140.04%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
77.13%
Pre-tax income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.93%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-84.22%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
77.62%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.24%
Net margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
157.14%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
157.14%
Diluted EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.51%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.83%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
2.79%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 1.28%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.