PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.91%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 20.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.94%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 11.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.35%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 28.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.46%
Margin decline while AEM shows 6.85% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
G&A change of 0.94% while AEM maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.36%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 0.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-22.90%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.03%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 6.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.39%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 13.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.27%
EBITDA decline while AEM shows 41.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.67%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AEM's 17.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.96%
Operating income decline while AEM shows 54.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.00%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AEM's 28.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-97.81%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.58%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.34%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
272.83%
Tax expense growth while AEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.80%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.52%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.52%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.02%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.03%
Diluted share increase while AEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.