95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.60%
Positive growth while AEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.16%
Cost increase while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-0.21%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while AEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-188.44%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 49.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-27.33%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 47.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.09%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x AEM's 10.79%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.32%
D&A growth above 1.5x AEM's 9.55%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
3.46%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.18%
Operating income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-395.45%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.08%
Pre-tax income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-97.35%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
7.19%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.46%
Net margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.89%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.89%
Diluted EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.94%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.02%
Diluted share reduction while AEM shows 1.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.