95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.29%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 32.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.13%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 3.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.43%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 238.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.14%
Margin decline while AEM shows 156.61% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.77%
Other expenses growth less than half of AEM's 103.78%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-0.98%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 4.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.21%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 3.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.53%
Interest expense reduction while AEM shows 8.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.27%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 8.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.87%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AEM's 204.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.81%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AEM's 91.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.43%
Operating income decline while AEM shows 6185.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.14%
Operating margin decline while AEM shows 4707.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
34.41%
Similar other expenses growth to AEM's 44.61%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
8.09%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of AEM's 435.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.41%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AEM's 354.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.95%
Tax expense reduction while AEM shows 3321.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.35%
Net income growth below 50% of AEM's 294.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.67%
Net margin growth below 50% of AEM's 246.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
EPS growth below 50% of AEM's 292.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of AEM's 292.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 2.31%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.