95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.63%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 5.85%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
14.02%
Cost growth 50-75% of AEM's 22.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
9.27%
Positive growth while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
G&A reduction while AEM shows 0.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.93%
Other expenses growth less than half of AEM's 354.54%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-21.17%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 48.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.93%
Total costs growth less than half of AEM's 25.01%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.35%
Interest expense reduction while AEM shows 32.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
14.65%
D&A growth less than half of AEM's 51.34%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
16.07%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.45%
EBITDA margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.27%
Operating income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-535.20%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 43.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-91.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
170.24%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 16.37%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-92.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.44%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.44%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.20%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 12.44%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 12.56%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.