95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
30.83%
Positive growth while AEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
40.51%
Cost increase while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
16.30%
Positive growth while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-11.10%
Margin decline while AEM shows 5.07% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
G&A growth while AEM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.07%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of AEM's 90.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
37.18%
Operating expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.29%
Total costs growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
218.69%
Interest expense growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
50.21%
D&A growth while AEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.23%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 16.70%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.31%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AEM's 13.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.77%
Operating income growth below 50% of AEM's 55.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-21.45%
Operating margin decline while AEM shows 63.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.72%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 43.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-68.55%
Pre-tax income decline while AEM shows 235.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while AEM shows 242.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
78.26%
Tax expense growth less than half of AEM's 325.74%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-76.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.35%
Share count reduction while AEM shows 0.14% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.35%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.