PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.42%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 9.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.00%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-18.86%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 88.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.96%
Margin expansion below 50% of AEM's 71.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.57%
G&A growth while AEM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.49%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 108.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
106.14%
Operating expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-23.15%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.37%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-27.57%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-25.60%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.30%
EBITDA margin decline while AEM shows 39.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.52%
Operating income decline while AEM shows 792.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.14%
Operating margin decline while AEM shows 713.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
91.81%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
474.46%
Pre-tax income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
650.14%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
168.82%
Tax expense growth while AEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
463.45%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 21.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
635.77%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 10.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
460.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 17.86%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
460.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 17.86%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.