95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.88%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.44%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-4.48%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 6.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
9.53%
Positive growth while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.58%
Margin expansion while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.14%
G&A growth while AEM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
138.49%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.69%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 9.74%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-3.37%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 6.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.71%
Interest expense growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.50%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.60%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.19%
EBITDA margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.65%
Operating income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.70%
Operating margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.47%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.30%
Pre-tax income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.35%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-534.38%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
10.43%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.48%
Net margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.14%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.14%
Diluted EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.07%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 1.73%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 1.83%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.