PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.68%
Revenue growth below 50% of AEM's 5.48%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.85%
Cost increase while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.02%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AEM's 29.73%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.63%
Margin decline while AEM shows 22.99% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.14%
G&A reduction while AEM shows 0.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-399.25%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 158.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.04%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 26.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.38%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.17%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-1.88%
Interest expense reduction while AEM shows 13.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.47%
D&A growth while AEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.07%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AEM's 11.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.61%
EBITDA margin decline while AEM shows 6.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.37%
Operating income growth below 50% of AEM's 41.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.29%
Operating margin decline while AEM shows 34.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.30%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 48.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.11%
Pre-tax income decline while AEM shows 46.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.74%
Pre-tax margin decline while AEM shows 38.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
52.70%
Tax expense growth less than half of AEM's 244.81%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-1.53%
Net income decline while AEM shows 32.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.15%
Net margin decline while AEM shows 25.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.26%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.02%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.11%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.