95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.46%
Positive growth while AEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.50%
Cost growth above 1.5x AEM's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.06%
Positive growth while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
G&A reduction while AEM shows 2.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1387.56%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 69.81%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-1.79%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
20.94%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AEM's 4.27%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-9.14%
Interest expense reduction while AEM shows 3.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.09%
D&A growth above 1.5x AEM's 9.44%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-139.74%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.66%
EBITDA margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.70%
Operating income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2772.70%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-307.96%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-274.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
25.86%
Tax expense growth while AEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-306.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-273.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-306.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-306.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.14%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.12%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.