95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.17%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 10.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.48%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 14.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.25%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AEM's 2.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.42%
Margin expansion while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.41%
G&A growth less than half of AEM's 29.62%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.45%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 844.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-8.37%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 11.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.19%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 13.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.60%
Interest expense growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.46%
D&A growth less than half of AEM's 4.90%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
0.89%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AEM's 6.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.97%
EBITDA margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.15%
Operating income growth 50-75% of AEM's 5.27%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
3.32%
Operating margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-20.44%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 707.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.18%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of AEM's 261.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.35%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AEM's 227.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-25.34%
Tax expense reduction while AEM shows 174.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.06%
Net income growth below 50% of AEM's 332.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.23%
Net margin growth below 50% of AEM's 292.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Share count reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.35%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.