95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.14%
Positive growth while AEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.41%
Cost increase while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
28.42%
Positive growth while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.51%
Margin expansion while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.92%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2134.62%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.78%
Operating expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.94%
Total costs growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-51.23%
Interest expense reduction while AEM shows 114.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.89%
Similar D&A growth to AEM's 2.12%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
19.68%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.43%
EBITDA margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.60%
Operating income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.42%
Operating margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.06%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.50%
Pre-tax income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.22%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
344.84%
Tax expense growth while AEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.41%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.24%
Net margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.53%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.53%
Diluted EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.