95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.85%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.90%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-8.30%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.55%
Margin decline while AEM shows 1.34% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
G&A reduction while AEM shows 28.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
131.63%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-55.96%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 75.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.07%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 1.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.61%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.33%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 1.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.04%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.32%
EBITDA margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.48%
Operating margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
74.66%
Other expenses growth less than half of AEM's 473.97%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.88%
Pre-tax income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.30%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14030.23%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
4.90%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.62%
Net margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.06%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.06%
Diluted EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.09%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.21%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.31%
Diluted share reduction while AEM shows 0.10% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.