95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-18.59%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 0.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-21.01%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 6.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-16.62%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.43%
Margin expansion while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.65%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.93%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-34.11%
Operating expenses reduction while AEM shows 3.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-22.45%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 6.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-97.79%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-21.53%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 9.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.96%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.08%
EBITDA margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.78%
Operating margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-220.55%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-18.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.64%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.87%
Tax expense growth while AEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-18.77%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.92%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.92%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.05%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.24%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.11%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.