95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.44%
Revenue growth below 50% of AEM's 39.68%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.10%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 40.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
19.36%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of AEM's 37.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
8.08%
Margin expansion while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.24%
G&A growth less than half of AEM's 96.17%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.30%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 630.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
36.32%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AEM's 83.04%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.54%
Total costs growth less than half of AEM's 44.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.14%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.86%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 38.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.75%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of AEM's 15.06%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-1.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.09%
Operating income growth below 50% of AEM's 25.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.49%
Operating margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-176.76%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-45.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-51.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-46.04%
Net income decline while AEM shows 15.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.15%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.15%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.13%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 57.30%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 57.18%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.